|
New trademark law to be effective on
1st December 2001
The 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People's
Congress adopted the amendments to the Trademark Law on 27th October 2001.
The new law will become effective as of 1st December 2001.
The major changes of the law are as follows:
- A broader definition of trademark that can be registered. A
trademark that can be registered is now defined as "any sign that
is capable of being represented graphically which is capable of distinguishing
goods or services of one natural person, legal person or entity from
that of the others, including words, designs, letters, numerals, three
dimensional devices and color schemes as well as combinations thereof"
(Article 8).
- Relatively drastic changes to the absolute grounds for refusal
of registration, as provided in Article 10, 11 and 12. In particular,
Article 11 provides the following sign shall not be registered as a
trademark: if it consists exclusively of the generic name, device and
model of the goods; if it directly serves to designate the quality,
main raw material, function, usage, weight, quantity or other features
of the goods; if it is devoid of any distinctive character.
However, a trademark that has in fact acquired a distinctive character
as a result of the use made of it and distinguishable can be registered.
In the case of three dimensional devices, a sign shall not be registered
if it consists exclusively of the shape which results from the nature
of the goods themselves, the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain
a technical result, or the shape which gives substantial value to the
goods (Article 12).
- Addition of a clause to protect well-known trademarks in China.
Article 13 (a) provides "where a trademark seeking registration
in respect of identical or similar goods is a copy, imitation or translation
of a well known mark not yet registered in China hence is likely to
cause confusion shall not be registered and shall be prohibited from
using", Article 13 (b) further provides "where a trademark
seeking registration in respect of non-identical and non-similar goods
is a copy, imitation or translation of a well known trademark registered
in China hence is likely to mislead the public and detrimental to the
interest of the proprietor of the well known trademark, should not be
registered and should be prohibited from using". Besides, Article
14 further provides the factors to be taken into consideration in the
process of recognizing the well known status of a trademark.
- Decision of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB)
now subject to appeal. The decision of the TRAB is no longer final.
According to Article 32, Article 33, Article 43 and Article 49, any
decision made by the TRAB can be appealed to the People's Court, within
a term of thirty days after the receipt of the decision thereof.
- Preliminary injunction now available. Article 57 provides that
where the trademark registrant or interested party has evidence to prove
that a thirty party is infringing or is about to infringe the rights
of a registered trademark, and that if such infringing act is not timely
stopped, is likely to cause irreparable damage, he may, before initiating
legal proceedings, request the People's Court to adopt measures for
ordering the stoppage of such act and the preservation of property.
Article 58 further provides for the purposes of stopping infringement
act, under the circumstance where there is a likelihood that evidence
may be destroyed or lost or difficult to obtain later, the trademark
registrant or interested party may request the People's Court that the
evidence be preserved before initiating legal proceedings.
- Liability for damages now includes award for attorney fee.
Article 56 (a) provides that the amount of compensation for the damage
caused by the infringement shall be assessed on the basis of the profits
earned by the infringer or the loss suffered by the infringed party,
including reasonable costs for the stopping the infringement on the
part of the infringed party.
Article 56 (b) provides that inn case it is difficult to determine the
loss suffered by the infringed party or the profit earned by the infringer,
the Court may, according to the actual scenario of the case, determine
an amount of up to 500,000 Yuan as compensation for the damage.
However, selling, without knowing, the products that infringe the rights
of a registered trademark, and can prove that he has obtained the products
legitimately and provide the source of the products, he shall not be
liable for the damage.
- Co-ownership. According to Article 4, natural persons, legal
persons and other entities may jointly apply for registration of a trademark,
jointly own and enforce the rights of the registered trademark.
- Grounds for cancellation. A registered trademark can be cancelled
by the Trademark Office's ex officio action, based on violation of absolute
grounds for refusal (Article 10, 11 and 12). Any person may also request
the TRAB to cancel such mark based on the said articles. A registered
trademark can be cancelled if the registration is obtained in violation
of Article 13 (protection of well-known), Article 15 (application filed
by unauthorized agent), Article 16 (protection for geographical indication)
and Article 31 (protection of earlier rights). Trademark proprietors
or interested parties may request the TRAB to cancel the registration
based on Article 13, 15 and 31 within five years from the date of registration.
If a registration is obtained in bad faith, the owner of the well-known
trademark shall not be bound by the five-year limit.
- The power of AIC (Administration for Industry and Commerce) strengthened.
AIC officials now are empowered to seal or detain articles that are
suspected to have infringed the rights of registered trademarks (Article
55).
The implementing regulations of the law are now being drafted and will
become effective at the same time.
|